GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Wonder 1.0
aka OpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Wonder
- Author picksGPT-6.1 Terra1–0
- FasterMuse Wonder 1.01/1 postsmedian gap ~5.7×
As stated in each post, not a controlled benchmark.
Posts
7Tank ambush scene, four affordable models: GPT-6.1 Terra, Gemini 4 Argon, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Muse Wonder 1.0. Posted by @RafaCrackYT.
Bionic nautilus sim, four models one prompt: GPT-6.1 Terra, Claude Opus 5.5, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Muse Wonder 1.0. Posted by @maker_evan.
Photoreal human eye in the browser, four models: GPT-6.1 Terra, Claude Opus 5.5, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Muse Wonder 1.0. Posted by @maker_evan.
Pixel-art shiba in snowy Tokyo, four models: GPT-6.1 Terra, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Claude Opus 5.5, Muse Wonder 1.0. Posted by @maker_evan.
Pixel Hello Kitty walk cycle, four models: GPT-6.1 Terra, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, GPT-6.1 Sol, Muse Wonder 1.0. Posted by @ann_nnng.
Falling holographic Pokémon card, four models: GPT-6.1 Terra, Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 4 Argon, Muse Wonder 1.0. Posted by @Terry_Djony.
Same prompt, separate runs
1Not a controlled comparison: prompts, tools and time differ.
About this matchup
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Wonder 1.0 in real side-by-side tests: 7 posts from X where both got the same prompt; 2 posts report cost or time. Judge coding ability from the actual outputs.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Muse Wonder 1.0: which is better for coding?
Which is better for coding, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Wonder 1.0?
Author picks: where the author preferred one of the two, they picked GPT-6.1 Terra once and Muse Wonder 1.0 never. That covers 1 of the 7 posts here; each post is a different task, so watch the outputs above for the work you care about.
Which is faster, GPT-6.1 Terra or Muse Wonder 1.0?
1 post states a time for both: Muse Wonder 1.0 was faster in it (~5.7× faster). Times are as stated in each post; tools and settings differ between posts.
What have GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Wonder 1.0 been tested on?
The most-viewed of the 7 posts: pixel Hello Kitty walk cycle, four models (@ann_nnng), photoreal human eye in the browser, four models (@maker_evan), tank ambush scene, four affordable models (@RafaCrackYT). Categories: 3D & Shaders, Games, Simulations, Animations/SVG.
Summary
GPT-6.1 Terra and Muse Wonder 1.0 appear together in 7 posts on X: fake Genie 4 walkable world in one HTML file (@maker_evan), tank ambush scene, four affordable models (@RafaCrackYT), bionic nautilus sim, four models one prompt (@maker_evan), photoreal human eye in the browser, four models (@maker_evan), pixel-art shiba in snowy Tokyo, four models (@maker_evan) and 2 more. All are part of larger lineups with other models. In @RafaCrackYT's tank ambush scene, four affordable models, Muse Wonder 1.0 was faster (29 min vs 2 h 44 min), as reported in the post.
What each post reports
Only numbers stated in each post. “—” means the post doesn’t say.
Quick facts
| Model | Vendor | Released | Input $/1M tokens | Output $/1M tokens | Context (tokens) | Official links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Terra | OpenAI | 2026-10-26 | Announcement | |||
| Muse Wonder 1.0 | Meta | 2026-10-12 | $4 | $20 | 1,000,000 | Launch post · Pricing |
From the vendors’ official pages, checked 2026-10-26. Standard API list prices; each value links its source and a blank cell could not be verified. The archive’s own numbers above are what each post states.
Who won where
2- Tank ambush scene, four affordable modelsThe poster says GPT-6.1 Terra came out pretty solid.— the author’s view, @RafaCrackYT (paraphrased)
- Pixel Hello Kitty walk cycle, four modelsThe poster applauds GPT-6.1 Terra for being very fast and cheap, with work that is actually good.— the author’s view, @ann_nnng (paraphrased)
Prompts shown in the posts
A holographic Pokémon card fluttering down from the sky until it lands — @Terry_Djony








