aivs.tv

AI Coding

Chrome dino T-rex, Terra vs three Chinese models — Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra

0:00 / 0:21
Posted bynoclipepe@noclipepe · on X
View post on X

18 likes724 views

Scoreboard4

  1. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
    Time
    19 min
    Cost
    $1.25
    • medium confidence
    • Written “Kimi K3.1”; read as Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  2. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
    Time
    51 min
    Cost
    $0.59
    • medium confidence
    • Written “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash” after the 1017 update shipped; read as V4.1 Flash 1017.
  3. MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
    Time
    1 h 56 min
    Cost
    $1.86
  4. GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
    Time
    4 min
    Cost
    $0.17

Prompt

Chrome dino T-rex, Terra vs three Chinese modelsThe post doesn’t quote the prompt wording.

Author’s verdict
The poster says MiniMax’s dino is the fastest runner, DeepSeek made the best-looking one and Terra finished last.

@noclipepe’s view (paraphrased)

Kimi K3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GPT-6.1 Terra take on the same prompt behind Terra’s viral 3D Chrome dino run.

The post, itemised

Kind
Side-by-side
Task
Chrome dino T-rex, Terra vs three Chinese models
Mode
Not stated
Posted
Video length
21.3 s
Likes
18
Views
724
Bookmarks
8
Sponsored
No

Cost & time, as stated in the postAs stated: Kimi K3.1 19m, $1.25; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 51m, $0.59; MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1h 56m, $1.86; GPT-6.1 Terra 4m, $0.17.

Related

Kimi K3.1 ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 TerraCompare all 4 modelsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-6.1 TerraDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K3.1 ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Posted by @noclipepe on X. aivs.tv claims no ownership: it hosts a copy for fast playback and links to the post on X. Request removal

More with these models